Your Candidate Has a Criminal Record. Now What?

criminal background checkDid you know that fully 1 in three Americans has a criminal background of some kind? Given that frequency, it is almost certain that an employer who conducts background checks as part of the hiring process (90% of employers do) will find applicants with criminal records.

If employers used this background information to exclude anyone with any kind of criminal record, one-third of applicants would not be able to get a job. Given the problems our economy currently has with 7% unemployment rate (and a growing pool of long-term unemployed), this outcome would have clear consequences for our society in general.

In fact, a blanket exclusion policy is exactly what the EEOC has alleged in recent lawsuits against Dollar General and BMW, arguing that these policies create a “disparate impact” against members of a protected class. The application of the EEOC’s disparate impact guidelines is controversial, not least because it is challenging for employers to implement in practice. But the fact is that there is little or no clear criteria in place to help employers design a hiring process that is fair and effective in managing human capital risk.

Job Related Means Job Related

One of the key concepts relevant to this issue is to make hiring decisions based on job-related criteria – that is, criteria that are materially relevant to your business and the prospective employee’s role. When we take a look at the EEOC’s guidance on using a criminal record in the hiring process, we find an emphasis on job-related criteria. When we look at court cases dealing with these issues, we find an emphasis on job-related criteria.

The EEOC recognizes an employer’s right to manage risks through background screening, and the law supports excluding an applicant if their criminal background clearly creates unreasonable risks. But the law also requires that individuals be treated fairly.

Individualized Assessments Help Level the Playing Field

We take it as a given in our society that individuals are different from each other.  This idea certainly extends to criminal backgrounds, which vary widely.   Some individuals have records that are old, relatively minor, and clearly not related to the job they are applying for. Others might be more recent, serious, and relevant to the role they are applying for.

We’ve written before about the “Green factors” which are job-related criteria you can apply to background evaluations to reach equitable decisions about applicants. These include:

  1. The nature and gravity of the offense.
  2. How much time has passed since the offense and sentencing.
  3. Whether the offense is related to the job in question.

Once you have determined through background screening that an applicant has a criminal record, you must move on to an individualized assessment of his or her circumstances. In this process, you need to give a reasonable opportunity for the applicant to challenge your findings and/or present mitigating factors.

Using the information from the background report coupled with the result of an individualized assessment, you can come to an equitable and defensible decision about an applicant’s suitability to join your workforce.

You may discover that you have found an applicant who will contribute significantly to your business. This is a win-win outcome.

employment screening process

About MichaelGaul

Michael is a results-oriented marketing executive with over two decades of experience in employment screening, physical security, and business process management. Michael has deep experience in human capital risk management and a passion for educating business leaders and HR professionals on strategies that tangibly protect their interests. Michael serves on the Board of the Secure Cash and Transport Association (SCTA) and is a member of the Professional Background Screening Association (PBSA), and the American Society of Industrial Security (ASIS).
View all posts by MichaelGaul →